03.31.2025Genova Burns Partners Matthew Baker and Edward Bonett, Jr. Appointed to Law360’s 2025 Editorial BoardsGenova Burns LLC is pleased to announce that Partners Edward J. Bonett, Jr., Esq. and Matthew I.W. Baker, Esq. have been selected to serve on Law360’s 2025 Editorial Advisory Boards. This prestigious appointment recognizes their expertise and commitment to shaping legal discourse in their respective practice areas.
03.11.2025National Labor Relations Board Back to Quorum Strength as Member Wilcox Is ReinstatedIn an emphatic decision, Federal Court Judge Beryl Howell of the District of Columbia District ordered President Trump to reinstate NLRB Member Gwynne A. Wilcox to her Board seat. The President fired Wilcox, asserting unitary power over employees in the executive branch. Rejecting this broad construction of executive authority, Judge Howell concluded that Congress meant for some federal employees to be beyond the President’s reach except in limited circumstances.
02.21.2025Acting NLRB General Counsel Scraps Predecessor's Memos, Signals a New DirectionOn Valentine’s Day, the Acting NLRB General Counsel, William B. Cowen, delivered a greeting card of sorts to his staff and the public signaling a new direction for the agency. Commenting that “the backlog of cases at the agency is no longer sustainable,” Cowen rescinded 31 memos by his predecessor Jennifer Abruzzo, some totally and others pending further guidance. Implicitly criticizing Abruzzo’s expansive view of federal labor Law, Cowen stated, “[I]f we attempt to accomplish everything, we risk accomplishing nothing.”
01.27.2025Federal Contractors Get Relief from PLA and DEI Requirements This past week, employers received two reprieves from mandatory conditions before winning federal contracts. On January 21, 2025, Federal Claims Court Judge Ryan T. Holte ruled that President Biden’s 2022 Executive Order that federal agencies choose only bidders that agree to enter into project labor agreements (PLAs) with unions for any federal construction contract over $35 million is unlawful. Judge Holt sided with the plaintiff Contractors in ruling that the Executive Order improperly drives up prices and contravenes other laws requiring full and open competition in contract procurement. In sum, he tossed the Order as being arbitrary and capricious.
01.07.2025From Backcourt To The Gridiron, Universities Oppose The NLRB’s Enforcement Position Regarding Their Athletes On New Year’s Eve, the union attempting to organize Dartmouth College’s men’s basketball team dropped its NLRB case after winning a groundbreaking decision in February 2024 from a NLRB Regional Director who decided that the players were employees of the College, eligible to unionize, and ordered a secret-ballot election which the union won. However, Dartmouth appealed the Regional Director’s decision, including the decision to hold an election, to the Biden-appointed Board members of the NLRB, and the appeal was pending when the union dropped its case.
12.12.2024NLRB ALJs’ Job Protections in Jeopardy After District Court RulingOn December 10, 2024, U.S. District Court Judge Trevor McFadden, sitting in the District of Columbia, ruled that the job protections afforded NLRB Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are unconstitutional because they impede the President’s power to remove executive branch subordinates under Article II of the Constitution. This is the first decision to squarely address the protected status of NLRB ALJs after numerous claims nationally that the NLRB’s structure, including the status of Board members and ALJs, is unconstitutional. However, this decision, issued at the summary judgment stage, falls short of enjoining the NLRB from prosecuting unfair labor practice charges or pursuing remedies where the ALJ has found merit to unfair labor practice allegations. Nevertheless, this decision may be the first step toward narrowing the power of the NLRB’s judges to create law that conflicts with the will of the people and the labor relations agenda of the sitting President. VHS Acquisition Subsidiary No. 7 v. NLRB.
11.20.2024Not So Fast - Texas Court Derails DOL Rule Expanding Eligibility for Overtime PayOn November 15, a U.S. District Court in Texas put the brakes on the Department of Labor’s April 2024 Rule designed to make more employees eligible for overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act. State of Texas v. United States Department of Labor; Plano Chamber of Commerce v. United States Department of Labor.
10.30.20242024 Election: How Labor Law Could Shift Under Trump or Harris LeadershipThe Presidential Election is upon us with many indicators predicting a close election. The two candidates and their respective party platforms offer opposing views on many major issues. While some issues play more prominently in the press than others, issues related to Labor Law feature two vastly divergent approaches. Since President Trump already has a track record on federal labor policy and Vice President Harris signals support for President Biden’s labor policy, here are three areas in Labor Law that will be sensitive to who takes the oath of office on January 20, 2025.
10.09.2024Three Strikes: Lessons Learned From The ILA, Autoworkers, & Actors StrikesNow that the ILA short-lived but eventful strike is over, it is important to understand what this strike and the two noteworthy strikes of last year by the Autoworkers and the Actors-Writers have in common and what we might learn from them. Technology. Or, to put it a bit more expansively, the march of advancing technology pitted against the anxieties over job loss. The Autoworkers’ union picketed in part because of job vulnerability due to the increasing market share of electric cars, which require a different process to manufacture. Actors and Writers protested the way artificial intelligence is affecting and will affect their work. The ILA struck in part due to the threat automation presents to their jobs on the docks. The strikes were all viewed as successful by the unions because of significant wage increases. But were they successful at stemming the tide of technology or have they just plugged the dam? Put another way, what can employers do to embrace technology while also embracing its employees and maintaining labor peace?
10.08.2024Should I Stay Or Should I Go: The NLRB Weighs InOn October 7, 2024, NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo announced to her staff and the public that she intends to prosecute employers for “Stay-or-Pay” employment agreements, agreements that require a new employee to repay outlays for training if the employee leaves within a certain timeframe after being hired. The General Counsel reasons that such provisions are “presumptively unlawful” under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act, which protects the rights to unionize or engage in protected concerted activity, because they force employees to remain in jobs they would otherwise leave, or deter an employee from union activity so as not to risk termination and the repayment obligation.
This website uses cookies for site operation, security and analytics purposes, as described in our Privacy Notice and Cookie Notice. By clicking Ok, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.
OK
